Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Ophthalmology Associates: Elkins Brad MD
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
In my opinion, Dr. Brad Elkins should not be permitted to practice medicine. Although I signed a consent form for an FDA-approved surgical procedure as well as discussed my concern that everything about the procedure be FDA-approved, Elkins deliberately, and without my consent, used his equipment in a manner that is neither approved by the FDA nor by the manufacturer and he, consequently, damaged my eyes. During follow-up visits, not only did Elkins fail to confess that he performed my procedure in an off-label manner, despite my direct questioning regarding the matter, but he also was reluctant to admit that he decentered the refractive treatment in BOTH of my eyes (even though proof that he did so was glaringly obvious and later confirmed by two other physicians). His unconscionable and inexcusable actions were matched only by his arrogance and blatant disregard for honesty and adherence to ethical standards that one should expect from those in the medical profession.
Cons: Deceitful, dishonest, unconscionable
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|