Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Wekiva Forest Animal Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
We never had any problems with Dr. Frank until our cat had to have a tumor removed. He correctly diagnosed him and performed the surgery, however when we returned to have the stitches out 12 days later, a tech completed it and they never should have been taken out. His wound reopened later that day and we had to rush to find an emergency vet to fix our cat's open leg because his office closed early and the emergency vet line they take you to was closed also.\r
\r
When we called the next day to discuss some sort of reimbursement or help with the new vet bill we were told it wasn't his fault and he would have even charged us for the anesthesia to put him back under to correct the problem had we returned to his office. We are now $600 in the hole (more than the original surgery even cost!) to fix something that he should have fixed himself. Not happy.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|