Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Roofing Co
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The workmanship of the Roofing Company is superb, however it does come at a price. Compared to other companies doing the same work TRC is considerably higher in its estimates. I have consulted with neighbors regarding roof repair costs they have incurred and companies they have hired to do the work. Since the repairs that TRC does...roof work...is long term, sometimes once in a lifetime, it is difficult to compare the lasting quality of a specific repair with other companies who offer the same work at lower prices.
I have a rather large gripe about their policy of requiring 1/2 of the estimated repair costs be paid prior to beginning the actual repair. In my case they kept close to 700 dollars of my money for SEVERAL MONTHS prior to doing any work. This is money I could have been using for that period, but instead they had the use of it.
I don't mind making a down payment, but it would seem to me that much less than half the cost should be required, and it should be due no longer than 1 month prior to the work being performed. With the volume of work this company does, it seems obvious to me that if a customer defaults, they would easily be able to fill the work time allotted to the defaulter with another job(s). It just seems to me that this practice is an rather unscrupulous way to keep operating capital high at all times at the customer's expense.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|