Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Roofing Co
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The workers were GREAT! They were quick, polite, and very professional. My only complaint is when we got the estimate, the gentlemen didn't pull back any of the siding. So, when the workers came, they found out we had no water protection against the house. So, that added a lot to the cost and the decision had to be made right then. It would have been nice to know in advance to budget the cost and to be able to have a discussion with my husband before needing to make a split second decision.
RESPONSE FROM The Roofing and Remodeling Company:
The existing siding on the home is aluminum and can become bent easily when manipulated. During the evaluation process of the estimate it was determined the source of the leak was caused by poor workmanship from the contractor who installed the existing roof. The existing step flashing was nailed to the roof by the previous contractor prior to his installation of the shingles, by nailing down the step flashing before the shingle installation the step flashing forms a L flashing. The proper installation of step flashing is for the flashing to be installed between each course of shingles. The incorrect installation of the step flashing was the source of the leak. When the foreman began removing the siding the lack of weather barrier was noticed. Although our goal is to be as thorough as possible during the examination process, we can not risk damaging the clients property by pulling back aluminum and risking bending it. We strive for 100 customer satisfaction and regret Sanci's frustration in this unavoidable circumstance.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|