Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Drain Service
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
You plumber out of Tacoma is great. Sat. 26 May, Adam came out and got it flowing again in good time. He snaked it and it ""flushed"", thought it was good to go, unfortunately there was an underlying problem which on 29 May Steve found with the camera. He did a great job! Referred his recommendation to Apt Mngr. Thank you! \r
I would like to mention something though: On Sat I called RR @ 2:13; I got a call from somebody with RR @ 3:31 telling me the Tech was delayed, cool, got it thank you. However, Adam wasn't called untill AFTER the guy called me(3:32) yes it's only a minute but how could he have known the Tech(Adam in this case) was delayed if he had not talked to him FIRST? Adam showed up @ 4:40, not bad. Would someone please look into this?\r
All in all, great job, thank you again, Scott
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|