Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Mudd's Restaurant
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The setting for Mudd's is wonderful as always. The new menu required explanation from the waitress. With the delightful garden associated with the restaurant it would have been lovely to have more vegetables on the menu - specifically a vegetable plate.\r
\r
The ravoli was sent back as the dough was undercooked and heavy. Further cooking eliminated the crunch but the dough was stil thick and tasted of flour.\r
\r
The crab cakes while generous in size where not particularly tasty. \r
\r
The pea soup was good and the tendrils of peas a delicious and visual treat.\r
\r
The chocolate cake for desert was disappointing. It was dry and tough. The carmel sauce seemed nonexistent. \r
\r
Overall we would not go back. Too bad as the setting is beautiful and they have the makings of a really fine restaurant.
Pros: Beautiful setting
Cons: For the most part the food was diasappointing
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|