Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Inlingua Languages Svc
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
It took 10 days, instead of the paid for 3-day service, to receive the final version of the translation. The first draft, which we received 5 days after the payment processing date, had numerous (about half of the entries of the document) translation errors. In addition, there were also such careless errors as translating exactly the same terminology differently in different entries on the same page and within the document. The corrections we requested upon reviewing the first draft were incomplete as well - instead of the specific terminology that was supposed to be corrected it was simply substituted for the whole entry, thus omitting important information. The instructions on our part were extensive and detailed. We ended up having to do the research and all the cross-referencing ourselves. The director of the center, Olena Ingram, in a phone conversation, while being polite and maintaining a professional tone of voice, agreed that the service provided was of low quality. More so, after checking the proposed by us changes, she agreed that our suggestions were correct in all except one entries. But even in this entry the initial translation was corrected.\r
In response to us requesting a 50% discount for the service that took twice as long as promised, with us having to do half the work, Ms. Ingram offered a 10% discount for a future service provided by the company.\r
Pros: Professional phone conversation
Cons: Poor quality of service, not meeting promised due date
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|