Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Lallana, Enrico C, Md - Coastal Neurology Svc Inc
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
We brought my stepson to Dr Cass. The appointment was rescheduled from their end 3 times in 4 days, once by prerecorded message giving an inaccurate time. The staff passed the buck to someone absent, also stating they don't use prerecorded messages.
The doctor himself refused to incorporate new information into his assessment, and kept trying to push a course of treatment that would allow him to prescribe a medication for which he was displaying many promotional materials. My wife and I have some knowledge about several aspects of the possible diagnoses, and were clearly informed enough to have a dialogue. However, the more we tried to offer a different view of things, the more visibly annoyed the doctor got. He did not accept our advocating for the boys best interest; he seemed to want to be deferred to totally. At one point he even googled an answer to a question we had, and assumed a condescending attitude.
We will take the boy elsewhere.
Pros: Not a one (1 star because, stupidly, none is not allowed)
Cons: Unprofessional staff, uninformed, condescending doctor
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|