Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:
G & G Management & Devmnt
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
Review content:
Worst property management company ever! Do not bother with them. The owner, Norman Gopin is bombastic and does not have a clue how to manage a property. He talks about his success at Beaconsfield Terrace which I have heard is in Brookline. Our Board was considering G&G (I believe they keep changing the name of their company to confuse people). However, the reviews we received from his properties were terrible. No one seemed satisfied with his services and several owners have been yelled at by him. In one case, someone told us he threatened to break an owners door down to gain access to their unit. I hope the violence does not escalate! He claims to do things on the cheaper side but you get what you pay for - we heard that Beaconsfield underwent a huge roof replacement project a few years ago and although he claimed it was for another reason, the roof again needed extensive and costly repairs last year that were not covered by the earlier project. The owners are ready to vote him out but he has stacked the board with cronies. Our own board was looking at G&G but asked around and heard that they are rated extremely low and similar properties either have rejected using G&G or not even considered them. If G&G calls your complex, as the song goes, ""just walk on by!.""
Pros: Claim to be less expensive
Cons: You get what you pay for!
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
Reasons are required.
|
or
Cancel
|