Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Honorable Devon Anderson
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Judge Devon Anderson doesn't know how to be fair. She definately uses her personal feelings instead of a sound mind. I sat through a preceeding where she let the Assistant District Attorney get away with whatever he wanted, while she shut down the Defense Lawyer at every possible turn. There was one point where the defense lawyer presented paperwork to her and she actually threw (as hard as she could) the papers at him and nailed him in the face with the papers instead of handing him back the papers. Is that how we expect our judges to act in the courtroom. She is lucky that I was only a spectator and not a juror becuase there is no way I would have convicted the man on trial at the time. Even based on the evidence I would not have convicted, but her attitude would have made it a done deal for me not to convict.
Pros: None that I have seen
Cons: Uses her feelings not her brain
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|