Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Realty Mart
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
WE LOOKED AT A DUPLEX AND TOLD THE AGENT OUR SITUATION. WE WERE UNMARRIED, POOR CREDIT, AND ONLY ONE OF US WORKING. WHEN WE WENT TO APPLY, WE EACH PAID OUR CREDIT CHECK MONEY AND WERE TOLD FLAT OUT THE MOST YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO IS PAY A DOUBLE DEPOSIT. THE NEXT DAY WE GOT A CALL THAT BECAUSE ONLY ONE OF US WERE WORKING AND WE WERE UNMARRIED WE WOULD HAVE TO PAY DOUBLE THE DEPOSIT AND THEN ANOTHER DEPOSIT ON TOP OF THAT FOR THE BAD CREDIT. IF WE WOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT THE UNMARRIED SITUATION TO BEGIN WITH WE WOULD NOT HAVE EVEN APPLIED AND NOW WE ARE OUT $70. THIS COULD HAVE GOTTEN US A WEEKS WORTH OF GROCERIES OR TWO WEEKS WORTH OF GAS. I AM VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS SITUATION AND HOW WE WERE FALSELY LED TO PAY MONEY, KNOWING FULL WELL WE WOULD NOT HAVE QUALIFIED.
Cons: THE PROPERTIES LAWN WAS LONG AND LOTS OF WEEDS, SEEMED TO BE WAITING FOR SOMEONE TO MOVE IN SO THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF IT.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|