Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Veterinary Emergency & Specialty Hospital
|
|
Review by:
clarence k.
|
|
Review content:
February 13, 2012
Dr. Mueller:
I have had a week to look over the records and speak to some Veterinarians about the entire process from the pre operative tests and results and all of the history up to her having to be put to sleep. I will address each one in the succession in which they occurred.
The first visit to VESH was for a consultation with Dr. Lackner on December 2, 2011. At that visit I had many questions and one of them was how soon after surgery would Daisy be able to see. I was told that Daisy would be able to see immediately after the procedure. As you know, and from all of the reports up to her death, she was never able to open her eyes well and in my opinion never really regained any quality of life increased vision. I see where the reports state that Daisy is visual, I could not disagree more. I even went as far as videotaping Daisy to illustrate her trying to get out of the bedroom and how disorientated she was in her movements banging into things and the like.
On December 9, 2011 blood and urine were collected and cataract surgery could be performed once the test results were in and within “normal”range. We know now that the pre operative blood work for the kidneys had a BUN reading of 52 more than double the high side of the scale and a Creatine level of 1.8 which was .4 outside of the high side range for normal according to standards within the Veterinary industry. So given these facts, why was the surgery scheduled and performed? I have to assume that either no one was aware of the readings and went forward with the surgery, or the desire to conduct business and collect money was placed in front of the animals well being. In either case in my opinion it was negligence to take such a risk.
After the surgery and after getting Daisy home, it was obvious that she had no vision. I returned her immediately and was told her eyes were swelled from the procedure and I should see improvements over the weekend. She was prescribed Rimadyl 75 MG once a day for the next 10 days. No warni
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|