Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
KIRKWOOD AUTO CTR
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The evaluation of my radiator problem was accurate. The repair was fine, and resolved my problem. The additional findings, as recorded on the receipt, and as described by the service advisor, were puzzling. I was informed that an error code was found, indicating a cylinder mis-fire. I asked if the check engine light was on, and was told that it was. Additionally, it was noted that the a/c was not working. As part of the initial evaluation, it was reported that apparent collision damage was the likely cause of both the radiator issue and the a/c problem. In summary: there was/is no collision damage, the check engine light was not showing (although the low fuel light was on), the engine runs fine, and the a/c is humming along nicely. I'm glad I followed my instincts and decided against the service advisor's suggestion that I have a full evaluation done for those two issues, since neither "issue" actually existed. Perhaps my car was mistaken for another vehicle? Perhaps the technician mistook the fuel light for the check engine light? In any case, I got what I paid for, and what I brought the car in for. I'm left to wonder about the other observations...
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|