Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Gregg R Wexler Law Office
|
|
Review by:
Naomi K.
|
|
Review content:
To be honest, I've never retained his services. It never got that far.
A couple years ago I needed to retain an attorney for my father for a personal injury case against a business. Not knowing any lawyers personally, I did what anyone would and looked through the yellow pages. I came across his name--because of a television ad, I knew it--and called.
He answered the phone and I started to tell him what I needed. Before I got into the long story, I told him what entity I was seeking damages from. He let me tell my entire story before he told me that he once represented that entity and there would be a "conflict of interest" on his part. I think he was just curious (because I called a couple other attorneys but they told me right away that they weren't interested) and/or he was going to give the entity a "heads up". Either way, I thought it was a little back-handed on his part.
Now whenever I see an advertisement for his services, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|