Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Dr. Edward Keuer
|
|
Review by:
Guest
|
|
Review content:
We had a terrible experience with Dr. Keuer's office. This office appears to be solely focused on generating revenue. While Dr. Keuer recommended against surgery for our son's condition, he stated that some form of treatment was medically necessary due to the sensitive location of the condition. The treatment consisted of a twenty second application of a topical ointment which we were required to remove two hours after the office visit. Notwithstanding the fact that we did not pursue surgery, we received a bill from Dr. Keuer's office for a surgical procedure. When questioned about the characterization of the treatment, their office claimed that they were required to categorize the treatment as surgical. We asked our insurance company to look into the matter. Our insurance company (Blue Cross/Blue Shield) indicated that our insurance would cover the treatment if the doctor's office revised the bill to correctly reflect the basic/routine nature of the visit/treatment. The doctor's office refused to work with the insurance company. Because of the black hole that is our healthcare industry, we opted not to pursue the matter further and paid the bill in full. The doctor's office cashed the check as payment in full (as was indicated in the correspondence that accompanied the check) and then claimed that there was a late fee. Good grief, who thought that a doctor's office could make a used car salesman look good. In short, this office is a racket. They should stick to purely elective procedures so there is no confusion that they are simply interested in maximizing the fees and fleecing the patient.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|