Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Jackson Pediatric Dentistry
|
|
Review by:
Denise K.
|
|
Review content:
Dr. Pink is a pediatric dentist and sees only children in a shared office with another dentist. While Dr. Pink is very knowledgeable and friendly, we did have a few problems. My insurance would only pay for x-rays and fluoride treatments once a year. So it was decided that at one six month check up they would get x-rays and the other check up the fluoride. Well Dr. Pink’s staff would not read the charts and give my girls a fluoride treatment and then I would get billed. They also bill a lot more than the insurance company felt was reasonable so I ended up with a considerable out of pocket expense for something that should have been covered 100 percent.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|