Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Animal Hospital Of Livermore
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I believe Bonnington really took advantage of my old parents. He told them that their 14 year old dog needed 2 broken teeth removed, a 3rd cleaned and 2 x-rays to support the dental surgery. The price was estimated to be $825 to $900.\r
\r
The actual services done were a teeth cleaning and 4 back x-rays ($125 each) to show the dog?s arthritic condition that everyone already knew. Bonnington later said that no teeth were broken nor needed to be removed. The total actual price was more than $1,000.\r
\r
My parents ended up paying more than estimated and received services that were not in line with the original diagnosis. Additionally, the dog never received the IV fluids that were paid for and needed, since the dog could not eat or drink for 12 hours.\r
\r
Either Bonnington cannot tell 2 broken teeth from 2 unbroken teeth or, as I believe is the case, simply wanted to scare my parents in order to take advantage of them. The back x-rays were entirely unnecessary. Additionally, having a
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|