Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Bartels Law Firm
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
After recommendations by friends regarding Anthony Bartels, I went to Bartels Law Firm to appeal my denied Social Security Benefits. I met with these people one time during the initial appointment to review my case. No one has met with me or called me since that initial visit, other than through a failed hearing before a law judge. All other communication has been through the mail. I have never laid eyes on Mr. Anthony Bartels. In calling into the office, they are only familiar with you through your file number. The receptionist and office staff is not friendly and courteous. After the second denial, Mike Sherman was assigned to appear at my hearing before a law judge. This was the first time I had ever seen him or spoken with him. He was not familiar with my case and spent the entire time thumbing through my paperwork. He never spoke up in defense of my case. After two years, we're now in process of filing the case before a review board. From my earlier experiences, I am not optimistic towards a favorable outcome. If you want a law firm who cares about its clients, becomes acquainted and familiar with the case, and really works hards towards obtaining your benefits, I would suggest that you look elsewhere.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|