Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
LIVERPOOL VILLAGE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
A good friend of mine threatened to sue this vet practice unless they refunded all monies spent there. The practice refunded the money rather than go to court. It centered around the negligent veterinary practice of a Dr. Nicole Jordan and a Dr. Douglas Wojcik. I feel compelled to share this on behalf of my friend in order that justice be done. My friend signed a document saying she would not make websites about the place telling the story in exchange for her refund. The facility wants to protect it's ""reputation"" but that's the problem. People have the right to know the truth about a veterinary facility before they put their pets lives in it's hands. There is nothing stopping me from speaking on behalf of my friend and frankly nothing stopping her. She can if she wishes leave a review or things of the like. She only agreed not to make websites which name the facility or the doctors names despite what the document says that she signed. They would have a hard time proving ""damages"" in court if they wanted to go after her for publishing private information which she is entitled to. As a fellow lawyer of my friend, I speak with confidence.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|