Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Randazzo, Angela, Dvm - Webster Groves Animal Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
This place presents itself as a premier emergency care facility, but really it is just a regular vet's office with longer office hours and under-trained and inexperienced vets servicing pets with health concerns beyond WGAH's expertise. They exterminated the love of my life's favorite pet by knee-jerking the wrong treatment and then not taking appropriate emergency action until it was too late except to have the poor dog suffer for another couple days. Then they compound the error by insisting that we pay for the pleasure of their killing of her best friend and advise that an autopsy is unnecessary and redundant to their findings. I have worked for a (ethical and professional) vet who said that not only would he have done a complete autopsy at no charge, but that he would have remitted all charges upon the killing of a healthy, happy two-year old beautiful dog. If you want to take your pet to a vet factory for regular checkups, WGAH may be fine, but if you want emergency care for a member of your family, go to Kirkwood Animal Hospital or any of the number of specialist vets who will keep emergency office hours. Please, for Lucy's sake!
Pros: Long hours open
Cons: Inefficient, marginally competent, uncaring
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|