Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:
Ultimate Property Management
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
Review content:
\r
1) I had trouble having my phone calls returned, sometimes waiting 2-3 days. Usually I had to call back again and again. UP has only one email address. \r
\r
2) Simple requests such as pictures following moveouts were difficult to attain. I had to ask them to go back to get them. \r
\r
3) Without notice, UP took it upon themselves to hire a company to go and spray for weeds and pass on charges to the owner and tenent. Lease agreement holds tenent responsible for weeds. (Home is apart of HOA)\r
\r
4) Tenent complaints were not tended to in a timely manner. Case in point - tenent notified UP that the stove has two burners not working. The matter wasn't resolved until a new property managment company was in place (>30 days later). \r
\r
5) UP didn't follow strict instructions and signed a tenent for 6 months vice 1 year. \r
\r
6) UP sent out contractor to replace generic shower head, what was installed was a premium variable shower head. (Good for tenent, not so good for me) Would have prefered prior notice of purchase.\r
\r
7) Industry standard I'm sure, UP uses it's own pricy repair contractor. They didn't look out in my best interest keeping repair costs low by shopping around. \r
\r
8) UP was instructed to have all locks rekeyed and send me a spare set, this didn't happen. \r
\r
9) Monthly payment was inconsistant sometimes being received the 2nd-3rd week of the month. If late charges were charged to the tenent, UP kept them. \r
\r
Overall, I believe it is Ulimate Properties' poor service to the tenent that has lead to a high turnover rate of this property.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
Reasons are required.
|
or
Cancel
|