Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Appliance Factory Outlet
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
The person who is posted this complaint is Justin McNaughton fails to inform you that in the course of Appliance Factory Outlet''s (""AFO"") attempts to resolve his complaint, he provided AFO with contradicting and inaccurate information. \r \r \r He also fails to inform you that the BBB did not take any action on his complaint because of the following reasons:\r \r He first informed AFO that the damage to the floors of his house was caused by AFO and that he owned the house. AFO could not determine fault; however, because AFO could not determine fault, AFO trusted Mr. McNaughton's version of facts and AFO offered to pay him approximately $850 solely based on Mr. McNaughton's word. Mr. McNaughton told AFO that he owned the house and that AFO should pay him. While AFO drafted a legal release to settle Mr. McNaughton's claims, AFO learned that Mr. McNaughton was not the homeowner, he was a tenant. AFO verified this with the El Paso County Assessors records. As such, AFO could not legally settle with the tenant, Mr. McNaughton, unless the homeowner authorized AFO to pay Mr. McNaughton to settle damage to the homeowner's house. This is because the damage was to the house for which the homeowner suffered a financial loss, not Mr. McNaughton.\r \r \r \r \r When AFO informed Mr. McNaughton of this, he first continued to insist he was the homeowner, then he admitted he was not the homeowner but, ""there was no need to get the homeowner involved."" Mr. McNaughton lost all credibility with AFO and AFO grew even more suspicious of his claims. Nonetheless, AFO is still offered to pay him for the alleged damage if he and the homeowner sign a release. Mr. McNaughton refused to sign the release. As such, AFO has done all it can and the ball in in Mr. McNaughton's court.\r

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel