Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Hastings Ford Lincoln Mercury
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
My son just bought a car from Hastings Ford Lincoln and got to play the I'll go squeeze the managers arm game (which was time consuming and offensive - (do they really still think customer's don't know what they are doing? ). It was a used car, but the dealership personally guaranteed it was gone over by their mechanics and there was nothing to disclose about the car and that it was in perfect shape. We asked for a car fax but was told the Ford Report was just as honorable. It was a rental car and the accident that the car was involved in was not reported to car fax or was it on the Ford report. So who should have reported this accident? A different door was put on the drivers side and the paint used was not the same shade as the car and was not only on the door but was painted on the rear fenders as well The mechanic would have clearly know it was a different door than factory when the car was on the hoist. A reputable dealership should have added/updated the work done on the report and should have disclosed it to the buyer. This dealership was dishonest in disclosing that the car was in an accident. and had different door installed on it. They will not work with him to get it fixed and pretty much said ""to bad for you"".. I just really feel they were dishonest at disclosing there was indeed car damage to the car. They have lost our business and I hope other customers be very very cautious.
Cons: NON DISCLOSURE OF DAMAGES TO A CAR
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|