Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:
Royal Peacock
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
Review content:
I've never before felt compelled to post a negative citysearch review, but this place was just that special. Arriving on saturday night to a half-empty restaurant, we were told to wait at the bar for 15 minutes while they cleared off a two-top. Apparently they were expecting a full house, but the restaurant was completely empty by the time we left at 8pm. We tried ordering mixed drinks, but to no avail. The bartender, we learned, is the owner's son, and he comes and goes as he pleases. \r
\r
Then there was the food, which finally arrived after a long delay. The rice was so undercooked that it was actually inedibly crunchy. We tried to order more rice, suggesting as graciously as possible that they cook it this time, but it never came. We made do with the mediocre naan. \r
\r
Worse yet were the entrees. The ""tapas"" portions aren't just small plates, they're nanoscopic. Our saag paneer ($4) was a small layer of saag in a saucer with one piece of paneer, Sind ke jaan ($8) was inedibly salty. Goan vindaloo ($5) lacked substance, subtly, or kick. Total damage was $55 for six tapas, naan, and two glasses of cheap red. And, for the first time either of us could remember, we left a restaurant hungry. Avoid this place, you'd do better at almost any other Indian establishment in the front range.\r
\r
Pros: Garlic and onion naan wasn't bad.
Cons: Service, quality of food, tapas portions.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
Reasons are required.
|
or
Cancel
|