Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Richard A Brimer Inc
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
We spent hour talking but mostly about other people and things unrelated to what I was there for. He has one violation against him and if you read the report against him he was discussing his sexual deviations with a client, the charges were for unethical behavior and after reading the report I don?t see why he is still working in this line of work. \r
\r
I know with me he lied to me, he lied about me, and he talked to people he didn?t have a release to talk to. He required test that he refused to except the results when in favorer of the client. \r
\r
When confronted with the facts that I was getting a second opinion the next visit he dropped me claiming the lack of patent client trust. I think he was concerned because the second opinion was with a doctor of higher credentials that had already stated the treatment would be unethical because of the test results.
Cons: Everything
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|