Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Carolyn M Young Fiduciary Services
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Unfortunately, this web site has become toxic, and no longer serves the purpose for which it was intended. As indicated in a previous post, when the court decides a conservatorship/trust case, there is usually an individual who loses control over their relative or the relative's assets (old Chinese proverb... ""You never really know someone until you share an inheritance with them.""). The ""losing"" party, unable to express their outrage against the legal system, launches an attack against the court appointed fiduciary.
You can identify such an individual by the tenor of their attack... it usually lacks sophistication, attacks on a personal level, contains gross generalizations and fails to remind the reader that all the actions of the fiduciary were reviewed and approved by the court. Finally, the attacks are anonymous, which allows the writer to avoid penalties for libel or slander.
If you really want to consider working with (any) fiduciary, simply schedule a personal meeting with that fiduciary and ask as many questions as you wish; review the individual's record with the state licensing board... chances are you will then be able to make an intelligent, informed decision without anonymous postings.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|