Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Robinson Transport Inc
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
David Hoss is evidently unhappy and is'nt on the roster\r
at Robinson'n now or ever. If the DAC report complaint\r
of his were true he has a good lawsuit. I don't believe him or his other complaints and hope anyone looking for work gives them a look and check them out themselves rather than let someone ruin something that might be just what they might be looking for. They have good equipment,management,dispatchers,owners, mechanics. They work with you. Check for yourself and\r
ask older drivers why they have stayed then decide.\r
Jack Charles
Pros: as good as I've been with
Cons: been with 5 companies in 22 yrs should be looked at
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|