Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:
Animal Medical Clinic
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
Review content:
There are two duplicate entries for this clinic for some reason on CitySearch, but I read a rant about it, which was criticized.
I verified from credible sources that the clinic's head, Dr. Randy Tesar was disciplined by the State Veterinary Medicine board twice.
In 1993, he was fined $2,000 and put on a two year probation for permitting an unauthorized personnel to perform surgery.
In 2006, he was fined $750 for records violation.
The Animal Medical Clinic is also named as defendant twice. March 2002 and February 2006. The February 2006 is logged as ""Civil Negligence""
The 1993 incident is very concerning.
Cons: Questionable background
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
Reasons are required.
|
or
Cancel
|