Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Pgh Enterprises Inc
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
These folks were hired by the Water District in our area. Apshalt patch was laid during sub freezing temperatures to areas were the asphalt was cut and removed to perform work. Standard practice dictates a temp of no lower than 40 degrees should be encountered while using asphalt hot mix. The patch work was horrific at best. Like a 4x4 course. It appears that the road paving, performed over the existing and poorly patched surface, doesn't have a tack layer between surfaces either. Also of concern is the two inch raised edge of the pavement that runs parallel to the existing road surface. The paving is two feet narrower than the existing road in several places and does not follow and obvious pattern. \r
This would create a hazardous situation for children on bicycles, people walking the block, or vehicles should they step/drive off this shoulder area. \r
The logic used to add lose grave to this area as a solution boggles the mind. \r
In addition the standard practice of returning properties to their pre-construction layout is of little concern to these folk. The preferred comment for crew members seems to be to the effect, ""there is a easement so we can do anything we like."" \r
Thanks goodness when not providing the easement answer they have the good taste to blame it all on the water department.\r
Pros: Will bid on anything qualified or not, never their fault
Cons: Will sign off on questionable contract specs and smile
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|