Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
District Justice Mark W Martin
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The case in which Judge Martin dismissed U.S. law in favor of Sharia law shows that Judge Martin should not be in the position he is in.
I am a devout Christian. I am also an American. Judge Martin is also an American, one who has served his country in the military. For that, I appreciate Judge Martin. However, somewhere along the way, Judge Martin has either lost his values as an American or has become so afraid of Islamic backlash that his ability to uphold the laws of the U.S. are skewed by his fear of those he is in charge of judging on U.S. law.
I don't pretend to understand atheists or why the victim of the assault by a Muslim man felt the need to be offensive to religions. By dressing up as zombie pope and zombie Mohamed, atheists felt the need to express their views that people of faith are zombies...ok, that I understand. I don't agree, but I understand.
However, this is the U.S. and not an Islamic nation. Judge Martin had no right to refer to the victim as looking like a doofus, who doesn't look like a doofus dressed up for Halloween? Judge Martin had no right telling the victim that had he dressed the way he did in an Islamic country that he would have been killed. This is the United States of America, not an Islamic country.
However, Judge Martin ruled as if he were ruling in an Islamic country. Judge Martin sent a clear message to American Muslims that it is alright for them to forcibly attack those they believe are being offensive to Islam. This is an attack on the First Amendment of the Constitution that Judge Martin is supposed to be devending and upholding.
In light of Judge Martin's either loss of American values or his cowardness in having to rule against Muslims when they commit a crime, Judge Martin clearly needs to be taken out of the legal system. At the very least, Mark Martin has no right being an U.S. judge.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|