Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
District Justice Mark W Martin
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Upon reading the article regarding Mark Martin, I was frankly stunned at his brashness and lack of objectivity while sitting on the bench. Not only did he fail to properly try this particular case but he also, very clearly, states HIS position on it and why HE, as a Muslim, understands why a fellow muslim did what he did. Without knowing a single thing about this case, hearing what the ""judge"" said, I would immediately understand this judge was extremely biased and clearly pushing an agenda.
I truly hope the people of Mechanicsburg, and Pennsylvania, have the backbone to not stand by idly and ensure Mr. Martin is removed from his position of power. For the record, I would have the same exact opinion on this if it were a Jewish, Christian, Hindi, etc judge who used their faith as a reasoning for their supposedly impartial rendering of the law.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|