Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
District Justice Mark W Martin
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The United States of America is founded on Constitutional Rights, one of which is the Freedom of Speech. Judge Martin violates the victims First Amendment Right to Free Speech. He calls the victim a ""doofas"". The judge also insults Christians by implying that Christianity is not a way of life, while Islam is. I have watched the video of Talaaq assaulting the victim. I have listened to the testimony of both sides. A police officer testified that Talaaq did in fact assault and batter the victim. This Judge in ruling for the defendant has in fact shouted to the world that if you proclaim to be Muslim, you are free to assault anyone in the US and claim it is because of your religious beliefs. In case the Judge has forgotten, there is also a Constitutional Amendment that allows for freedom of religion (the reason why most of the early settlers came to America to begin with). One would wonder if a similar ruling would have been made if the victim was Muslim and the attacker a Christian?
There needs to be a Judicial inquiry in this case and ALL of the Judge's cases should be reviewed.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|