Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
District Justice Mark W Martin
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Judge Martin,
I am active duty, from what I have read of you, you also served. That to me means that you took an oath, not ust when you became a judge, but also when you decided to serve all Americans by supproting and defending the constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. Well your honor (if that should even apply any more) you have broken your oath not once but twice in this ruling. You berated the victim, if you watch the video he was the victim, in this case for not being sympithetic to the fact that the attacker was a muslim and he offended him. Well sir as I have taken the oath to support and defend the constitution and you have greatly offended me and milliions of other veterans who are speaking out about this, on the internet and in friendly discussion. An ignorance of the law does not give one a right to break it. In this case there is beyond a shadow of any doubt that the defendant broke the law and physically assaulted the victim for what he percieved should be law. There are constitutional groups now attempting to decide what action will be taken against your un-lawful, inflamatory, and un-constitutional speach given at the end of the trial. As an Oath Keeper I am a defender of the constitution and a soldier for the people, your transgressions against the people of the United States have not gone without notice, you have become the domestic that we defend constitution from, we have lawyers looking into your abuse of power and the possible charge of violating the defndants first and fourth amendment rights as well as any civil liability that you incur. Be ready for a fight your honor, we come not with physical assault as it would be illegal and un-constitutional, but we come with paperwork and the constitution.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|