Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Desert Dunes Animal Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I brought in my dog December 12th to be examined. Lucy had been short of breath, lethargic, generally not herself. I waited a couple hours while tests were run. All tests came back favorable or inconclusive. I was sent home with antibiotics and a cough suppressant. The antibiotics seemed to help, but only marginally, and Lucy never returned back to normal. Tragically, Lucy passed away in the early morning of the 22nd, and just having finished the antibiotic prescription. Although the sincerity and customer service that followed the examination (staff called for several days following the appointment to follow up), I do think that from a veterinary standpoint someone should have asked further questions from a case involving an animal with problematic symptoms yet returned all normal test results. More thinking outside the box and less “cure with a pill” protocol. Perhaps this could have changed the nature of this review. \r
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|