Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Roofwerks
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Roofwerks is apparently a new-ish roofing company started by some folks who used to work for Baker Roofing. I've never dealt with Baker Roofing, but Roofwerks did the roofs in my town house community. The roofs appear to be fine, but the crews cause lots of damage to other property, and they refuse to take responsibility for the damage. Some things they have fixed, but they dented and damaged gutters on my bulding and have refused to fix them but most irritating is that they ripped my window screens and flatly refused to pay for them when confronted with their damage. They said no one saw them do it and couldn't prove they did it. They added that screens were cheap to repair and that I should just do it. My question is: If they're cheap to repair, why didn't they just pay for them to be repaired in the name of customer service?"" The only conclusion I can come up with is that they do not really care about customer service.\r
Pros: Nice looking roofs
Cons: Lots of collateral damage, tar stains, dented gutters, ripped screens
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|