Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Sr. Screen, Inc.
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Description Of Work: Pressure cleaned pool enclosure cage; completely rescreened enclosure; upgraded doors(2) with new actuating cylinders, handles, latches and bug sweeps.
Member Comments:
The process took place in three stages. First was the estimate and proposal, followed by a pressure cleaning of the enclosure's cage and finishing with a complete rescreening of the enclosure. Sr. Screen was selected along with several others after a lot of time was spent studying members' reports. Scott Brunelle, owner, came to the house within a few days of being contacted and made one of the better estimate presentations I've received from Angie's List providers. He described in detail what the job entailed and his approach. He even had a small booklet prepared which listed his company's experience, qualifications, awards, description of the premium grade of screen material he uses(Phifer) compared with a standard grade, testimonials from a number of customers and certifications regarding his licensing, and liability insurance. Incidentally, he didn't just leaf through this document, he left it with me. The second phase of the job was carried out by one of his key employees, Cody. Which just happens to be Scott Brunelle's son. He spent part of a day pressure cleaning the cage. Cleaning is the key word. I haven't seen it look that bright since it was completely replaced 12 years ago. The final phase, rescreening, was done with a break of about a week. Normally they like to do the rescreening after a day or so to let the cage dry out, but in our case, the extra delay was because I guess we were from the old school and wanted to use the same color as the replaced screen which was gray, not charcoal. The rescreening took Scott, Cody and another employee a little more than half a day to complete. The overall size of our enclosure is approximately 28 by 35 feet. This is information that I would have found useful in evaluating estimates. I would suggest that members consider including this information in their reports. When the job was done I felt quite proud of the outcome. The panels feel as tight as a drumhead.
Thanks again for such a great job.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|