Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Dave's Main Street Motors
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
This is Dave at DMSM in response to pookiej272's review. Unfortunately we get some disgruntled customers from time to time. This particular reviewer revealed enough about herself that we felt we should respond to defend ourselves because she is not being truthful.
Yes it is true the vehicle was reposssessed. It is not true they never made late payments, in the eight months they had the car only two payments were on time. The reason the vehicle was repossessed was they failed to return phone calls after the recurring payment they arranged in an attempt to keep the account current was declined by their bank. Their decision to avoid contact with us to make payment arrangements ultimately led to our decision to repossess the vehicle. We had previously worked with them to overcome financial hardship and would have again but they chose to ignore our attempts to contact them.
It is also true they didn't maintain insurance which they freely admit. Which is not only the law but a contractual obligation. We never denied them access to their property. The repossessions are contracted to a third party and the customers deal directly with their agents post repossession. The vehicle had been cleaned out by the customer prior to being returned to us and they were able to retrieve their personal belongings within one day of the vehicle being repossessed.
I have no doubt they are angry their vehicle was repossessed but it was due to their own actions. We didn't have any communication with them until after the vehicle was recovered and we contacted the repo agent to make arrangements for them to recover the property on Sat which is not a normal business day for the agent. He met them on his own time due to the wallet being in the car. We were never rude to them at any time. To leave a misleading review is dishonest and unfair.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|