Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:
Van Houten, Mark S, MD - Neurological Consultants
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
Review content:
Office staff not especially friendly. Operation seems to run on speed; assembly line feeling definitely present. I was presented immediately with the question of why my doctor would refer me to him in the first place, as ""neurologists see people with serious diseases"" as he put it. First of all, shouldn't neurologists be the ones to determine whether or not you HAVE a neurological condition? He acted as if I didn't deserve to be there since I didn't walk in with one that was blindingly obvious. He predetermined what he expected me to have, ran me through the basic battery of neuro tests in less than five minutes and then told me I probably had a ""serotonin disorder"" that was making me THINK I had something wrong, and then dismissed all the obvious and visible problems I had as ""microscopic"" and nothing to be concerned about. The person who wrote about being told to see a psychiatrist is right on the money. He decided what he thought I had, tested me quickly and superficially to ""confirm"" it, and then handed me a flyer from a large pad he had on his desk that just happened to describe the ""new thinking on these issues"" as being a serotonin disorder. He then told me to go back to my doctor, and if the doctor didn't like it he could get me a second opinion. He was extremely arrogant about it, like he was daring me to do it. I go for a neuro consult and I get a psychiatric ""diagnosis"" with no testing or prescriptions beyond five minutes of talking and five minutes of basic tests. Apparently, he's willing to ""treat"" you if you show up already obviously debilitated; if you expect to be evaluated to determine WHETHER you have a problem or not, see somebody else.
Pros: short wait time
Cons: short wait time because he rushes people through like herding sheep
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
Reasons are required.
|
or
Cancel
|