Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
J & R Towing & Recovery Repair
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
J & R Towing was held UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE by the Trial Court of Masachusetts, Small Claims Division, on March 6, 2012. Grinnell v. J & R Towing, Recovery and Repairs, Inc., No. 1160SC001485.
The court awarded DOUBLE PUNITIVE DAMAGES, under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection law, M.G.L. 93A, ? 9. The court held J & R Towing knowingly and willingly misrepresented facts to induce the customer to transact; and the customer was harmed by reasonably relying upon J & R Towing?s deception.
Factors the court may have relied upon include: (1) J & R Towing knew, or should have known, it made a promise to deceive the customer to transact; (2) J & R Towing manufactured fraudulent receipts and sought to induce the customer to defraud a third party; (3) J & R Towing would have profited by at least 300% by its deception were it not but for the customer?s knowledge of the law and enforcement of rights; (4) J & R Towing failed to reply, or offer reasonable settlement, in bad faith with knowledge, or reason to know, its acts violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law, chapter 93A, ? 2; and (5) J & R Towing failed to appear before the court after reasonable and legally sufficient notice.
THEREFORE, all those seeking to transact with J & R Towing should be informed that on at least one occasion, that company has been adjudicated as using unfair and deceptive business practices as described by the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law. Further, J & R Towing has acted so that it was FOUND EGREGIOUS ENOUGH TO RISE TO THE HIGH THRESHOLD REQUIRED TO AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES under M.G.L. 93A.
Foregoing stated by Plaintiff Creditor on March 12, 2012.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|