Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Bayonet Point Eng
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
REBUTTAL: There have been several negative reviews posted and statements made regarding one dissatisfied customer of Bayonet Point Engine over the past 6 months. While this has appeared as often as possible on the Internet, Mr. Darrel Peters had filed a claim with the Small Claims Court of Pasco County. The final trial took place on December 8, 2009, and the results are as follows: The court has found for the Defendant, Bayonet Point Engine. Mr. Darrel Peter?s claim has been denied by the Court because Mr. Peters did not allow Bayonet Point Engine the opportunity to take care of their warranty of his engine, transmission, and carburetor work which was preformed by this facility. Further more, Mr. Peters violated federal law, Mr. Peters permitted the improper installation of a different carburetor and removal of emissions related products prompting an investigation. Mr. Peters failed to provide proof of his claim by producing the many witnesses that he claimed he had to prove his case. Bayonet Point Engine prevailed in part due to the testimony of its expert witness, Randy Chiavaroli. Pros: Wins in Court

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel