Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Hghb Architects: Scates Kenneth
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
The original review was published on another website in April, 2008 and applies to both partners, Scates and Korchek. It is republished here to warn potential clients of the risks of hiring either architect.
April, 08: Arrogant and incompetent. Stay away from these guys. The 1st design placed the swimming pool easily in the range errant golf balls. Wedding guests entered next to the dumpster. The general contractor originally bid $20M on a budget the architect set at $12M. They wasted $500K to get down to $20M. For another $750K, they came up with another bad design that screws the members paying for it. Their picture should be in the dictionary next to negligent and incompetent.
February, 09: The construction is complete and the clubhouse is simply bad. The main feature is a long, dark dungeon like hallway. The exterior is ugly. The interior is closed, dark and fails to support the club's needs. The old bldg. had a Grill Room where everyone gathered to eat, drink and socialize. Scates replaced it with a bar that's too small, too noisy, and oriented in the wrong direction as it restricts the terrific view. The casual dining area isolates people and the fine dining is used mostly by the employees on their breaks. The building is sited badly wasting limited land. These architects are simply bad, really bad.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|