Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Tower Life Building
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
This building did not become the Tower Life building in the 40s. The Zachary family had its grimy little hands on this prize until the 70s or 80s. It was the Transit Tower before that. Please state the facts correctly. (and your last name is Navarro? Really?) Sad, I don't believe that the Zachary family will alway keep the wonderful old building pristeen. Thank goodness, for now, though, it is safe from the greedy Houston developers. Compare cities and you can see what I mean. History means absolutly nothing in Houston, save a few handful of people. Somehow the developers have kept zoning at bay by convincing the public to vote against their own self interest.
Pros: Beautiful Architecture
Cons: none, as long as the owners don't bastardize it any more than it has been which is minimal
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|