Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Craigie on Main
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
this is going to be regarded as sacrilege. i went to dinner at craigie on main in november and had the 10-course tasting menu ($115). it cannot be said to be vastly-overpriced since the labour put into the food is clearly vast in quantity, and the nice new location and beautiful kitchen must be somehow paid for. yet, for my money, a tasting menu created under the direction of a chef should have coherence and structure. some will doubtless disagree that tasting menus have two purposes: 1) to allow the diner to try a range of preparations from the restaurant, more than would normally be possible, 2) to allow the chef the luxury (rare) of composing not only dishes in isolation from each other but dishes as components of a whole experience.
the dinner we had was abundant in quantity and rare ingredients and lavish in preparation but it was not coherent, at least not to me. win on 1, fail on 2. i give it 3 stars because it would be possible to compose an excellent meal there out of menu items (5 stars) but the thing i am reviewing (the 10-course tasting menu) is overpriced and fails to come through on one of its two deliverables (1 star, possibly).
(the bar at craigie on main, on the other hand, is a winner.)
Pros: the food is abundant and carefully-prepared
Cons: the tasting menu is incoherent
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|