Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Kootenia Homes
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
Their build process was along the lines of getting input so that they could put responsibility on the buyer with the least amount of time spent on their end so that they could get the project finished and take their cut. They provided very little input as to design and changes. If you have your own designer, they may fit the bill, but expect to pay your designer well to be involved all along. Once finished, they tend to put responsbility on their subs rather than stand up for the product. I can't believe a relatively well-received builder was so sub-par. Perhaps they used to be better, and perhaps they will be again now that times are lean, but they sure weren't there for us. Pros: Solid structure, basic building Cons: Minimal design input, poor coordination for higher-end changes

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel