Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Amore Infused
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
No one expects to have dinner theatre put them off their food. You hope for some entertainment that is engaging while not making you completely forget the meal before you. Sadly, the cabaret show at Amore makes a person down their food and drink compulsively in an attempt to escape the drone of it's mostly bad acts.
While the menu holds up and delivers what it promises - excellent taste sensations (heavenly sauces) and the ambiance of the resturant is pleasing enough, the cabaret show is at least two-thirds atrocious and ultimately dysfunctional. For starters, there needs to be a dedicated emcee who can create a stir with his/her voice and can actually enunciate words. Although there were apparently some technical difficulties (no-really?) this should not be the time or place for a rehearsal run of the show. And as to the old radio detective show format, there are reasons they had REAL actors play those parts on the original shows: people who are not actors cannot act, and obviously none of them had ever read the script before. And there is another reason the old radio shows worked: you did not see players lack of expression or out of role costumes while the show was going on. Though there were a handfull of acts that were truly entertaining, they were eclipsed by cast members who either can't sing or can't choose arrangements that suit their voices, and an unintelligible announcer, as well as abrubt starts and stops of music, equipment failures and lack of sound effects for that dull radio thing. Someone really needs to rethink this disaster before the few good performers are thrown out with the overwhelmingly ( and here I'm being kind) mediocre. Perhaps the head of this debacle can salvage a show, e.g. concentrate on the bellydancer, the two female burlesque acts, and the female impersonator. Show business is brutal. Make sure your prospective performers have exceptional talent before you put them on stage. That's what auditions and rehearsals are for.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|