Stephen E Doyne Phd

I was engaged in a custody dispute with my ex-husband. Basically, husband didn't want a divorce after he found out how much support for three children was. Then he attempted everything in his power to take my children. It is difficult to effectively write about this man and not use the forbidden expletives. So just think of what expletives you would use if a doctor involved in your court case wrote a clearly biased report (since your ex-husband paid for the report), sent your children to a "specialist" for evaluation who turned out to be his very close doctor friend (they actually share the same billing person); quite a cozy relationship and way for him to bill twice as much money (unethical). and also prescribed all your children pills to cope. The matter was settled when I revealed his underhanded cozy relationship with his doctor friend and refused to shut up about it. I got threatening letters for me to stop writing about it, to stop talking about it, yeah whatever. He wrote a report that I was dangerous. The only thing dangerous about me is that I would not shut up, I was vocal and would not shut up. I got my children after I had him by his huevos. He is a legal [expletive] [you can fill this part in]. You will be surely sorry if you are not the paying party. Cons: I feel his is unthical but remember that's my opinion more

I would not hire this doctor unless I wanted a biased report. He leaves pertinent information out of his reports in a biased way for whoever is paying him. I do not believe he has the health, safety, and welfare of minor children in mind. The report he wrote for our family was very inaccurate and had a great deal of information that did not pertain to any of our pasts. I would not hire him. He should not be license to practice. I would only recommend to your worst enemy. If the court appoints him request a different person otherwise you will get a biased report!!! Pros: Parking Cons: bias more

I agree with prior opinion. Who payed him got the ruling. Serious statements were not entered into report. Major descrepencies through out numerous pages of the report, details confused, Not questioned about serious allegations, just were put in report and found guilty with no basis except a statement out of context many years prior. Statements considered fact from a young child. He ruled by what 2 others said without questioning me or giving an oportunity to refute opinions with fact.He is considered the expert witness and his "ruling" is weighted heavily and would cost tens of thousands of dollars to refute, and show the true facts wihch is evidence based. It is a game except to the ones who are affected by it. His fees are $300.00/per hour and the eval cost about $10,000.--For a psych opinion plus the attorney costs of both sides combined is about $500.00/ per hour. That leaves you with an $800.00 an hour bill. Sounds like a racket. Cons: biased/ rules for payee/ looked for evidence to bolster unfounded opinion more

I would not hire this doctor unless I wanted a biased report. He leaves pertinent inofrmation out of his reports in a biased way for whoever is paying him. I do not believe he has the health, safety, and welfare of minor children in mind. Pros: Parking Cons: biased more