NEW YORK (CNN) --\r
\r
In August 2008, on Monday, Supreme Court Judge Joan Madden ruled that sites must hand over any identifying information it possesses about the blog's creator.\r
\r
Once the blog is traced to a name, the next step will be to take the detractor to court for defamation. \r
\r
In her ruling, the judge quoted a Virginia court that ruled in a similar case that nameless online taunters should be held accountable when their derision crosses a line. \r
""The protection of the right to communicate anonymously must be balanced against the need to assure that those persons who choose to abuse the opportunities presented by this medium can be made to answer for such transgressions,"" the judge said, quoting the Virginia decision.\r
\r
""The court recognizes that the Internet is not a place where people can freely defame people or their businesses. Disguised in comforting anonymity, bloggers and online commenters can type some pretty nasty things – accusations and language that they’d never say to people face-to-face. However, the masquerade ball has just ended."" \r
\r
Bloggers should watch out. The court just rewrote the assumed rules for online decency.\r
Pros: Everything
more