Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Hanna & Ruud LLC - Steve Hanna
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
My son (with my financial backing) hired Mr. Hanna to defend him for a DUI/DWI. This was all new to both of us, since neither had a criminal record and weren’t sure what to expect and how the process worked. During the initial consultation with Mr. Hanna, he told us if you plead guilty to the DUI/DWI, the cost would be $750 and if you want to fight it and use a jury trial, the fee would be $2500. He assured us that he would not take a jury case, unless he knew he could win it. With his projected confidence that he could win with a jury trial, my son retained Mr. Hanna for $2500. After retaining MR. HANNA, my son (accompanied by me) showed up for his first court hearing and we were met by Mr. Hanna’s associate (Mr. Ruud), whom neither of us had met previously or were told that my son would be represented by anyone other than Mr. Hanna. One would think that this information should have been disclosed before showing up in court to meet for the first time. Mr. Ruud handled many other
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|